02/02/2016 08:25AM
Recording Secretary: Richard Hudson
Location of meeting: Room 10
Was a quorum established? Yes
Was the meeting advertised? Yes, 08/17/2015
Members Present:
Stroleny, Shelley (Principal)
RIVERS, SHELTON L (Alternate Principal)
Fernandez, Cheli (Teacher)
GARCIA, GUILLERMO (Teacher)
Hudson, Rick (Teacher)
TOLEDO, MARIA (Alternate Teacher/Paraprofessional)
Alvarado, Maria (Educational Support Employee)
MURPHY, JENNY (Parent)
SMITHIES, RICHARD (Student)
TORRES, ALEXANDRA (Student)
TOLL, DANIEL (Alternate Student)
WILLIAMS, J. HIRAM (Business/Community Representative)
Members Absent (Excused):
Robledo, Ingrid (Union Steward)
Daniels, Annette (Teacher)
Sejeck, Shannon (Teacher)
GONZALEZ, VILMA (Alternate Educational Support)
APOLLON, PIERRE (Parent)
ARGUELLO, ANA (Parent)
CERBER, SINCLAIR (Parent)
JACKSON, SHIRELLE (Parent)
ARAGON, MARGIE (Alternate Parent)
Kernan, Tom (Business/Community Representative)
Nobles, Melissa (Business/Community Representative)
Members Absent (Unexcused):
None
Others Present:
Maria de los Angeles-Fernandez
G. W. CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL
Educational Excellence School Advisory Council
Ingrid Robledo, Chairperson
E.E.S.A.C. MEETING Febuary 2, 2016
Council members in attendance:
Shelley Stroleny
Shelton Rivers
Cheli Fernández
Guillermo Garcia
Richard Hudson
Maria Toledo
Maria Alvarado
Jenny Murphy
Richard Smithies
Daniel Toll
Alexandra Torres
J. Hiram Williams
Council members absent:
Ingrid Robledo (chairperson)
Annette Daniels
Shannon Sejeck
Vilma Gonzalez
Pierre Apollon
Margie Aragon
Ana Arguello
Sinclair Cerber
Shirelle Jackson
Tom Kernan
Melissa Nobles
Guests
Maria de los Angeles-Fernandez
Approval of minutes: Mrs. Stroleny called the meeting to order at 8:25 a.m. The minutes from January 5, 2016, were reviewed and approved.
SIP Review: The EESAC is the sole body responsible for the approval and implementation of the School Improvement Plan (SIP). Mrs. Stroleny presented data from mid-year assessments: In English Language Arts, 85 percent of sixth-graders scored satisfactory and we need to improve to 93 percent as reflected on the 2015 FSA; 89 percent of seventh-graders scored satisfactory compared to 93 percent on the 2015 FSA; and 88 percent of eighth-graders scored satisfactory compared to 97 percent on the 2015 FSA. In Mathematics, 79 percent of sixth-graders scored satisfactory and we need to improve to 95 percent as reflected on the 2015 FSA; 59 percent of seventh-graders scored satisfactory compared to 93 percent on the 2015 FSA; in Algebra, 70 percent of students scored satisfactory compared to 91 percent on the 2015 EOC; and in Geometry, 88 percent of students scored satisfactory compared to 100 percent on the 2015 EOC.
Mr. Rivers presented data for iReady testing from Window 1 and Window 2. The mathematics data is as follows:
MATH - WINDOW 1 MATH - WINDOW 2
6th grade 509 515
7th grade 515 526
8th grade 526 537
The numbers represent the overall mathematics levels for the grades indicated.